FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the standard digital technique of using a larygeal mask airway versus videolaryngoscope guided insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway

A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE â?? GUIDED VERSUS STANDARD DIGITAL INSERTION TECHNIQUES OF PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/09/036259
Enrollment
150
Registered
2021-09-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L99- Other disorders of skin and subcutaneous tissue in diseases classified elsewhere

Interventions

Control Intervention1: PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY: VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE AND PROSEAL LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY

Sponsors

SRM Medical College Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age: 18-65yrs ASA I and II Patients scheduled for Elective Surgery under General anaesthesia using PLMA for Airway management

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: BMI > 35kg/m2 Known or Predicted or Anticipated Difficult Airway Disease related to the cervical spine Pre-existing Sore throat or Hoarseness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the first attempt Success rate and the number of Insertion attemptsTimepoint: 4 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To look for the Insertion time, Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), Leak volume, Fibreoptic Bronchoscopic view of Vocal cords , Peak Inspiratory Pressure, Hemodynamic changes and Postoperative airway morbidityTimepoint: 18 MONTHS—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR K Karthik

SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai

karthikkrishnamoorthy1981@gmail.com9884360796

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026