FindTrial
Sign In

Utility of flouroscopy in reducing dialysis catheter related complications in comparison to ultrasonography

To study and compare the complications of USG guided IJV hemodialysis catheter insertion technique without flouroscopy assistance versus USG guided IJV hemodialysis catheter insertion with flouroscopy assistance

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/09/036204
Enrollment
150
Registered
2021-09-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: N185- Chronic kidney disease, stage 5

Interventions

Intervention1: Permacath insertion: USG without flouroscopy versus with flouroscopy Intervention2: Permacath insertion: USG alone versus USG with flouroscopy Intervention3: Permacath insertion: Ultras

Sponsors

PGIMER
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: More than 12 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Local site infections Coagulopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of mechanical, infective and thrombotic complicationsTimepoint: Base line and 4 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Procedure time Ease of placing the catheterTimepoint: 1 month follow up—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSushma

PGIMER

drmanishrathi2000@yahoo.co.in9216721287

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026