FindTrial
Sign In

Ultrasound guided Sacral erector spinae plane block versus caudal epidural block for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery in children for analgesic efficacy

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block with Caudal Epidural Block using Ultrasound in Children Undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgery under General Anaesthesia; An Exploratory Randomized Control Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/08/036068
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-08-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Group I: Ultrasound Guided Caudal Epidural analgesia Group-II: Ultrasound Guided Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block: both Groups receive- bupivacaine (0.25%) at 1ml/kg volume under ultr

Sponsors

AIIMS Rishikesh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: •Age 1-9 years •Both genders •ASA Physical status I-III

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Parent refusal • Infection at the site of insertion of block. • Allergic to LA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Duration of analgesia provided by each block techniqueTimepoint: assessed using FLACC Score after 0 1 6 12 18 hours post operatively—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1)Total rescue analgesia required in 24 hrs. 2)Complications related to sacral erector spinae block. Timepoint: assessed after 24 hours—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Praveen Talawar

AIIMS, RISHIKESH

praveenrt64@gmail.com9654162941

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026