Skip to content

An experimental study comparing the effects of treatment response and severity of difficulty in swallowing in patients with pharynx or larynx cancer treated with two different radiation techniques (D0-IMRT versus standard IMRT).

A quasi-experimental study comparing dysphagia optimized intensity modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) versus standard intensity modulated radiotherapy (S-IMRT).

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/08/036041
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-08-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C00-D49- Neoplasms

Interventions

Intervention1: Dysphagia optimized intensity modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) technique: Contouring DARS (dysphagia and aspiration related structures) as a separate OAR (organ at risk) and reducing th

Sponsors

Karthik Subramaniam Thiagarajan
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Patients with stage T2-T4, N+, M0 carcinoma of oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx with squamous cell carcinoma histology only 2) ECOG performance 0-2 3) Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Patients with head and neck cancer with non-squamous cell carcinoma histology • Cancer sites other than oropharynx, hypopharynx, or supraglottic larynx • Patients with T1 N0 M0 (or M1) disease in the above-mentioned sites • Patients with recurrent cancer in the above-mentioned sites • Patients not fit for concurrent chemoradiation (or receiving chemotherapy other than weekly cisplatin) • Documented evidence of pre-existing swallowing dysfunction (not related to cancer) • Previous radiotherapy to the head and neck region • ECOG performance 3-4

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Severity of dysphagiaTimepoint: 3 months post radiation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Treatment responseTimepoint: Comparison of pre-treatment PET-CT scan with post-treatment PET-CT scan

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKarthik Subramaniam Thiagarajan

Sri Ramachandra University

dr_satishsrinivas@sriramachandra.edu.in9884780974

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026