Comparison between two intubating devices vLarynx Video Laryngoscope and Airtraq optical laryngoscope.

A Prospective randomized study to compare vLarynx video laryngoscope and Airtraq in adult patients undergoing elective general surgery.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/08/035847

Enrollment

Registered

2021-08-23

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: vLarynx video laryngoscope: video laryngoscope used for intubation. therapy duration depends on airway difficulty and MP grading. Control Intervention1: Airtraq: Optical channelled lary

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA grade 1 and 2 Age between 20 and 60 years Weight between 41 and 80 kg Gender - male and female Patients planned for elective surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Cervical spine injury Head and Neck Surgery Valvular Heart Disease CAD / uncontrolled hypertension Presence of raised intracranial pressure Mouth opening less than 2.5 cm Any pathology of oral cavity that will obstruct the insertion of device

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the number of attempts and time taken using the two devices for intubation.Timepoint: 8 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
to compare the glottic view using POGO (percentage of glottic opening) score Ease of tracheal intubation using these devices to compare the number of adjustment maneuvers required for successful intubation. to compare hemodynamic response after laryngoscopy and intubation. to look for post operative complications if any. to compare success of laryngoscopy and intubation in all classes of Mallampati grading.Timepoint: 8 months	—

Measure

Time frame

to compare the glottic view using POGO (percentage of glottic opening) score Ease of tracheal intubation using these devices to compare the number of adjustment maneuvers required for successful intubation. to compare hemodynamic response after laryngoscopy and intubation. to look for post operative complications if any. to compare success of laryngoscopy and intubation in all classes of Mallampati grading.Timepoint: 8 months

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSyed Hussain Amir

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, AMU, Aligarh

hussainamir77@gmail.com9897559183

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026