Health Condition 1: X- New Technology
Conditions
Interventions
Control Intervention1: nil: this is an observational cohort study.
Sponsors
Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing elective surgery requiring intubation American society of anesthesiology grade I-II Patients with ability to sit and open their mouth
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: PREGNANCY PRESENCE OF AIRWAY PATHOLOGY(INFECTIOUS/NEOPLASTIC) PATIENTS WITH HISTORY OF BURNS OR TRAUMA TO AIRWAY PATIENTS WITH RESTRICTED MOBILITY OF NECK AND MANDIBLE ALL PATIENTS WITH UNSTABLE CERVICAL SPINE
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the laryngeal view (Cormack and Lehane grading) by conventional laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy using C-MAC video laryngoscope, in adults undergoing surgery and comparing it with preoperatively assessed Modified Mallampati scoreTimepoint: 72 weeks | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the conventional laryngoscopy with that of video laryngoscopy using C-MAC video laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in adults undergoing surgery in terms of: time taken to achieve best glottic view, Number of maneuvers used, Time taken for intubation Timepoint: 72 weeks | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDr Parul Tanwar
Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital
Outcome results
None listed