FindTrial
Sign In

To compare three different techniques of double lumen tube insertion

Comparative study between three different techniques of double lumen tube insertion for one lung ventilation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/08/035717
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-08-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C399- Malignant neoplasm of lower respiratory tract, part unspecified Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Modified: Shape of double lumen tube modified according to the shape of standard pvc single lumen tube before insertion. Duration of intubation will be from the time of inserting direct

Sponsors

Rajiv Gandhi cancer institute and research center Rohini
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Those patients undergoing one lung ventilation will be included in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Edentulous patient MPG IV Oro pharyngeal carcinomas Insertion of univent tube or bronchial blockers for one lung ventilation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Modified curvature technique is equivalent to CMac which is better than standard curve of DLT insertionTimepoint: Time before laryngoscopy and after laryngoscopy—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Failed intubation Trauma to teeth Tube cuff ruptureTimepoint: Till 5 minutes after intubation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDeepti Gupta

Rajiv Gandhi cancer institute and research center, Rohini

mamcdeepti@gmail.com7065840893

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026