Comparison of two different lasers for crown lengthening.

Crown lengthening by conventionnal diode laser and blue lase: A clinico-comparative analysis.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/08/035561

Enrollment

Registered

2021-08-10

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Denlase: 980 nm soft tissue diode laser Control Intervention1: Blue lase: 445 nm soft tissue diode laser

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Periodontally healthy patients requiring crown lengthening for restoration of teeth. 2. Periodontally healthy patients requiring aesthetic crown lengthening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with systemic diseases that contraindicate periodontal surgery. 2. Patients having active gingival and periodontal diseses. 3. Smokers.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Visual Analogue Scale Wachtels Early Wound healing IndexTimepoint: Baseline, 10 days and 1 month	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Plaque Index Gingival Index Probing depth Bone level Clinical attachment level Biologic widthTimepoint: Baseline, 10 days and 1 month	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactInti Srividya

Vishnu Dental College

gautamipenmetsa@gmail.com9951011618

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026