CLINICAL EVALUATION OF WARM COMPOSITES on class I restorations

A comparative evaluation of warm composite with conventional composite on Class I restoration of mandibular first molar, according to FDI clinical criteria: A randomised clinical trial. - RCT

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/08/035532

Enrollment

Registered

2021-08-09

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: WARM DENTAL COMPOSITE: COMPARISON WITH NORMAL COMPOSITES Control Intervention1: NORMAL COMPOSITE: COMAPARISON WITH WARM COMPOSITE

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients in the age group of 16-45years with good general health and oral hygiene Presence of primary caries, in vital molars that require moderate sized class I restorations, ie. Between one quarter and no more than one third of the way between the central fissure and cusp tip. Low decay index. (equal to or less than 3decayed teeth) Absence of periodontal disease. Teeth with satisfactory restorations in need of replacement. Normal functional occlusion (class I molar relation) with at least one cusp in occlusal contact. Patient must be able to return for periodic recall examination.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient with fewer than 20teeth. Patients with parafunctional habits. Known allergic reaction against any component of used materials. Pathologic pulpal diagnosis with pain (nonvital). Fractured or visibly cracked teeth. Atypical extrinsic staining of teeth or staining of any existing tooth coloured restorations.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
There is a difference in the clinical performance of warmed composite and conventional composite on class I restoration of mandibular first molarTimepoint: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
There is no difference in the clinical performance of warmed composite and conventional composite on class I restoration of mandibular first molarTimepoint: 1st month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Jinet Joseph

ACPM Dental college

kavita.rudagi@gmail.com9673390777

Outcome results