FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the ease of airway device (LMA)insertion during general Anaesthesia

Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol for proseal insertion and hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing minor obstetrics and minor gynaecological procedures- a prospective randomized study - LMA Insertion

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/08/035374
Enrollment
72
Registered
2021-08-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: LMA insertion: Use LMA for minor obstetrics and gynecological procedures Control Intervention1: Propofol as induction agent: Propofol given at rate of 40mg every 10 seconds till loss of

Sponsors

Dept of Anaesthesiology
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients aged between 20 and 50 years 2.Undergoing minor obstetrics and minor gynecological procedures under general anaesthesia 3.American society of Anaesthesiologists grade 1 and 2 4.Modified Mallampatti Grade 1 and 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients requiring endotracheal intubation 2.Major procedure requiring muscle relaxation 3.History of hypersensitivity reaction to propofol 4.Patient refusal to proseal insertion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of LMA insertionTimepoint: 1min,2 min,5 min,10 mins after induction—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
HR,MAP,ETCO2Timepoint: Baseline,Induction,Insertion,1min,3 min,5 min,7 min,10 min—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDNithyaa

ESIC MC and PGIMSR Chennai

drshirishchavan@gmail.com9947098333

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026