FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of efficacy of Proppfol auto induction versus propofol midazolam coinduction in patients undergoing surgery general anaesthesia.

comparatibe study of efficacy of propofol autoinduction versus propofol-midazolam co induction using the priming principle in patients undergoing surgeries under general anaesthesia- A randomised comtrolled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/07/035204
Enrollment
80
Registered
2021-07-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Comparison of propofol autoinduction versus propofol midazolam co induction. : Propofol 0.4mg per kg as priming dose followed by induction dose Control Intervention1: comparison of prop

Sponsors

Chettinad Hospital and research institute
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: weight above 50kg

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA 4

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Dose requirement of inducing agent propofol will be estimatedTimepoint: Dose requirement of inducing agent propofol will be estimated, BIS will be monitored at baseline, post priming,after inducing every 15 seconds until BIS of 45 is attained and the dose required will be estimated—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hemodynamics monitoringTimepoint: NIBP-SBP,DBP,MAP, Pulse rate monitored every 15 seconds till intubation and 3minutes,5 minutes,10 mimutes, 15 minutes after intubation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr chethana ch

chettinad hospital and research institute

doctor.anaesthesiologist@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026