FindTrial
Sign In

A COMPARISION BETWEEN THE SUCCESS RATE OF INTUBATING BLOCKBUSTER LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY VERSUS FASTRACH LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY

A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL TO COMPARE THE SUCCESS RATE OF INTUBATING BLOCKBUSTER LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY (LMA) VERSUS FASTRACH LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY (LMA) DURING BLIND ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/07/035162
Enrollment
110
Registered
2021-07-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Blockbuster Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Versus Fastrach Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA): To compare the successful rate of intubating blockbuster lma versus fastrach lma Intervention2: INTU

Sponsors

Shri BM Patil Medical College
Lead Sponsor
Yuvaraj V
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1)ASA Grade 1 and ASA Grade 2 2)Patients requiring endotracheal intubation for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia 3)Age between 18 to 60 years 4)Both male and female patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Inability to consent for the procedure 2) Patients posted for emergency surgeries under general anaesthesia 3) Burns and swelling in neck region 4) Previous surgeries in neck 5) Morbidly obese patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the first pass successful intubation of blockbuster lma versus fastrach lmaTimepoint: 5 Minutes—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Succesful attempts and complications Timepoint: 24 Hours—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactYuvaraj V

Shri BM Patil Medical College and Institute Vijayapura

shivanandkarigar82@gmail.com9164319345

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026