FindTrial
Sign In

COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF I-GEL INSERTION i.e. STANDARD, ROTATIONAL, TRIPLE AIRWAY MANEUVER IN ANAESTHETISED PARALYSED ADULTS

COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF I-GEL INSERTION i.e. STANDARD, ROTATIONAL, TRIPLE AIRWAY MANEUVER IN ANAESTHETISED PARALYSED ADULTS -A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED TRIAL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/07/035083
Enrollment
180
Registered
2021-07-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R69- Illness, unspecified Health Condition 2: R688- Other general symptoms and signs

Interventions

Intervention1: three different techniques of i-gel insertion: comparison of three different techiques of i-gel insertion i.e. standard,rotational,triple airway maneuver in anesthetised patients. Inter

Sponsors

DR RPGMC TANDA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient with ASA 1 and ASA 2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Duration of surgery > 4hrs 2. Presence of sore throat. 3. Anticipated difficult airway. 4. Mouth opening 5. BMI > 35 kg/m2 6. Pregnancy 7. Patient at risk of aspiration eg. patients of gastroesophageal reflux disorder, previous history of PONV and hiatus hernia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
First attempt success rate of i-gel placementTimepoint: 1hr—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Total insertion time 2. Hemodynamic response during insertion 3. Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) 4. Ease of gastric tube insertion 5. Airway morbidity in terms of bloodstaining and sore throat Timepoint: 24hrs—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Versha Verma

Dr.RPGMC TANDA KANGRA

versha2u@yahoo.co.in9418152286

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026