FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of three different types of cavity Preparation in teeth with proximal caries

Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Three Different Types of Class II Cavity Preparation; Conventional Class II, Conservative Class II & Clark Class II Using Modified USPHS Ryge Criteria - An In Vivo Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/07/034687
Enrollment
150
Registered
2021-07-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Clark Class II: IN Group3 CLARK classII cavities will be prepared which will be having infinity margin Control Intervention1: Conventional Class II and Conservative Class II: In grou

Sponsors

Faculty of Dental Sciences SGT University Gurugram Haryana
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patient with No systemic disease. Molars with Class II caries Patient who give their consent and agree for follow up.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patient with Molars with pulp exposure. Irreversible pulpitis Patient those who donâ??t agree for follow up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Aesthetics,Function,Marginal Integrity,Biological Gross FractureTimepoint: 24hr,48hr,72hr,1week,2week,3month,6month,9month,1year—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
sensitivityTimepoint: 24hr,48hr,72hr,1week,2week—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR MANDEEP S GREWAL

Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana

drashthaarya@yahoo.co.in9810761757

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026