Skip to content

Comparison between autologous fibrin glue and sutures in treating receded gums using connective tissue graft.

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF AUTOLOGOUS FIBRIN GLUE AND CONVENTIONAL SUTURES IN THE TREATMENT OF GINGIVAL RECESSION USING CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT: A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED CLINICAL STUDY.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/07/034610
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-07-06
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K053- Chronic periodontitis Health Condition 2: K053- Chronic periodontitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Root coverage procedure by using connective tissue graft: Conventional sutures versus autologous fibrin glue, patient is recalled after 3 months and 6 months. Control Intervention1: Aut

Sponsors

T Haswitha Rao
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with class 1 and class 2 maxillary or mandibular marginal tissue recession, age group is 18 to 55 years, systemically healthy patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Systemically compromised patients, pregnant women, lactating mothers, malposed teeth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Increased root coverage with good healingTimepoint: At baseline,three months and six months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Healing of the tissue and amount of root coverage.Timepoint: Baseline, 3months and 6months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactT Haswitha Rao

Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences

haswitha.rao@gmail.com7036410752

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026