A Comparison of efficacy of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma and Conventional Sutures in Anchoring Split Skin Graft on Wounds.

Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma v/s Conventional Sutures- A Randomised Control Trial to Compare their Efficacy in Anchoring Split Skin Graft on Wounds.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/06/034401

Enrollment

Registered

2021-06-25

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma: Topical Application of Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma on wounds before placing split skin graft and suturing. Dose- calculated according to pilot stud

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with wounds of any etiology requiring Split Thickness Skin Grafting.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: HIV, Hepatitis, Malignancy, Coagulation Disorders, Diabetics, Thrombocytopenia (

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Immediate Adherance of Skin Graft on woundTimepoint: At 1 minute, 2. Minutes , 3 minutes of placing skin graft on wound	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Assess time to suture graft on wound with and without Platelet Rich PlasmaTimepoint: On table;Assessment of % of loss of grafted skin area.Timepoint: At 1st Post op dressing, 2nd Post op dressing, 3rd Post op Dressing;Assessment of seroma and hepatoma formationTimepoint: At 1st Post op dressing, 2nd Post op dressing, 3rd Post op Dressing	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Urbee Gupta

JN Medical College, Belagavi

urbeeg@gmail.com7259271207

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026