Skip to content

COMPARISON BETWEEN ROBOTIC BIOFEEDBACK- BASED UPPER LIMB REHABILITATION AND CONVENTIONAL PHYSIOTHERAPY IN CHILDREN WITH HEMIPLEGIC CEREBRAL PALSY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

A Pilot Study to evaluate the efficacy of Robotic Biofeedback-based upper limb rehabilitation in children with Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/06/034399
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-06-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G802- Spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy

Interventions

Intervention1: robotic biofeedback based rehabilitation programme for upper limb: (a)The device can be used to provide goal directed movement training for entire upper limb with movements at shoulder
Total duration of therapy : 12 months

Sponsors

Armed Forces Medical Research Cell
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children of either sex aged 5 to 18 years clinically diagnosed to have hemiplegic cerebral palsy Gross Motor Functional Classification System Score or GMFCS Score either I to III Minimum visual acuity of 6/60 Ability to follow simple single step commands Either parent should be willing and capable of following instructions and maintaining activity log

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Children who have received botulinum toxin injection in upper limb in the past one year prior to enrolment Children who have undergone orthopaedic corrective surgery in the past one year prior to enrolment Children with concomitant chronic systemic illnesses that can interfere with execution of intervention or physiotherapy Children with any acute illness that can interfere with execution of intervention or physiotherapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the efficacy of robotic biofeedback based rehabilitation for upper limb with that of conventional physiotherapy in 5to 18 year old children and adolescents with hemiplegic CP with Gross Motor Function Classification Scale Scores between I to III as measured by change in grip strength of affected hand at one year of initiation of therapyTimepoint: 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the change in following scores between 5 to18 year old children and adolescents with hemiplegic CP with GMFCS I to III receiving robotic biofeedback based rehabilitation for one year with those receiving conventional physiotherapy for one year Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test Scores or QUEST scores at 12 months and 15 months of initiation of therapy Grip strength of affected upper limb at 15 months of initiation of therapy Timepoint: 12 months and 15 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactJyotindra Narayan Goswami

Army Hospital Research & Referral

jngswami@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026