Skip to content

Efficacy of Electromagnetic Field and backward walking in Patients with Low Back Pain

Efficacy of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field and Retrowalking in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/06/034230
Enrollment
120
Registered
2021-06-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M95-M95- Other disorders of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue

Interventions

Intervention1: Pulsed electromagnetic field: Pulsed electromagnetic field and conventional treatment Intervention2: Retrowalking on treadmill: Retrowalking on treadmill and conventional treatment Inte

Sponsors

Guru Jambheshwar university of Science Technology Hisar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Non-Specific low back pain for more than 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.History of back pain due to any specific spinal pathological cause 2.Recent fractures of lower limb and spine 3.Any previous spinal and lower limb surgeries 4.Deformities in lower limb and spine 5.Any acute or chronic cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal problem apart from low back pain 6.Pregnant and lactating women 7.Patients with Pacemaker and unstable heart conditions 8.Diagnosis of epilepsy 9.Presence of open wounds on back 10.Patients with any neurological deficit 11.History of inflammatory joint disorder, infectious, metabolic and malignant diseases. 12.Uncooperative patient and patient not willing to participate in the study 13.Presence of any condition or any other reason due to which patient is unable to participate in study 14.Unable to walk without a walking aid

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Visual Analog Scale 2.Oswestry Disability Index 3.Hamstring tightness 4.Star Excursion Test 5.Tampa Scale Timepoint: At the baseline At the end of 6 weeks At follow up of 4 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Spinal mobilityTimepoint: At the baseline At the end of 6 weeks At follow up of 4 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSujata Sharma

Guru Jambheshwar University of Science and Technology Hisar

Sujatasharmaphysio@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026