VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY VERSUS DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

COMPARISION OF VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPY TO DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY FOR ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATON WITH MACINTOSH BLADE 2 IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/06/034047

Enrollment

120

Registered

2021-06-07

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Control Intervention1: VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE: TO COMPARE THE EASE AND TIME TAKEN IN SECONDS TO MINUTES FOR INTUBATION IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS BETWEEN VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY AND DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY Control Inte

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients scheduled for pediatric surgeries and requiring airway management

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Difficult airway 2. Obese patients (BMI >95 percentile) 3. ASA >3 4. patients with congenital anamolies 5. Patients with altered coagulation parameters 6. Patients with cervical spine injury

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
COMPARING THE EASE OF INTUBATION BETWEEN VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY AND DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTSTimepoint: TIME TAKEN TO SECURE THE AIRWAY WITH AN ET tube in seconds to minutes	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the pre and post intubation hemodynamics( Heart rate, Blood pressure, Saturation)Timepoint: Baseline, 1 min, 3 min, 5 min, 10 min	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKANUKUNTLA SHRAVYA

KASTURBA MEDICAL COLLEGE, MANGALORE

drsunilbv@gmail.com9620178559

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026