To evaluate and compare the gums displacement by application of three different methods.

Comparative evaluation of the amount of gingival displacement produced different retraction systems - An in vivo study.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/05/033569

Enrollment

Registered

2021-05-12

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Retraction Cord #000: Placement of the retraction cord, retraction paste and combination of retraction cord and retraction paste in clinically healthy mandibular molar tooth in each pat

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: No signs of gingival inflammation No signs of malocclusion No bleeding on probing Probing depth less than 3 Clinically healthy tooth Mandibular molar tooth selected

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Signs of attachment loss and clinical mobility Presence of exudate History of smoking Pregnancy Systemic illness History of medications

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Evaluation of amount of gingival displacements produced by different gingival retraction systems.Timepoint: Baseline, 2weeks, 4weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Since we are comparing different systems so system with best gingival displacement with minimal time ie combination of both cord and cordless can be used for better outcomes.Timepoint: 14days after placement of any retraction systems	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRachana shah

Thesis guide

aparna.narayan@manipal.edu9845648763

Outcome results