Skip to content

Comparative evaluation of two different techniques for maxillary sinus lift and immediate implant placement.

Comparative efficacy of osteotome vs CAS kit assisted indirect maxillary sinus lift and immediate implant placement in posterior atrophic maxilla â?? A clinico-radiological study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/05/033490
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-05-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K082- Atrophy of edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: CAS Kit: CAS kit (crystal approach system) introduced by Korean implant company â??OSSTEMâ?? Control Intervention1: Osteotome Technique: osteotome is a procedure tapped by mallet to cre

Sponsors

Sharad Pawar Dental College DMIMSDU
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All the patient requiring implant prosthesis in atrophic (RBH > 3mm) posterior maxillary edentulous patient with age > 18 years, minimum width 6mm and he/she must able to sign a risk consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. All patients who are contraindicated for implant therapy 2. Patient with healing socket (History of extraction 3. Patient who underwent radiation treatment in head neck area ( 4. Heavy smoker ( > 10 cigarettes/day) 5. Uncontrolled diabetic patient 6. Pregnant or nursing woman 7. Patient who are substance abuse 8. Patient with unrealistic expectation or on psychiatric treatment 9. Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised patient 10. Patient on oral or intravenous bisphonates treatment. 11. Patient with opposing missing teeth, having habit of clenching/bruxism. 12. Patient with Inflammation or acute sinusitis 13. Patient with periodontitis or with poor oral hygiene.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. To compare and evaluate the amount of bone generation. 2. To compare and evaluate the time required to perform procedure. 3. To compare and evaluate membrane perforation. Timepoint: 3 months from post operative procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To compare and evaluate the primary stability of implant. 2. To compare and evaluate the marginal bone loss. Timepoint: 3 months from post operative procedure.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Bhushan Mundada

Sharad Pawar Dental College DMIMS(DU) Sawangi(M) Wardha Maharashtra

pbmundada4@gmail.com9975629137

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026