Skip to content

Comparison between direct and video laryngoscope,in securing the airway in patients who are not suspected to have difficult airway.

Comparison of conventional laryngoscope with video laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with non difficult airways.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/05/033361
Enrollment
110
Registered
2021-05-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: J989- Respiratory disorder, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: laryngoscope-macintosh and king vision videolaryngoscope.: to compare the conventional macintosh laryngoscope with video-king vision laryngoscope in patients with non difficult airways

Sponsors

Shri B M Patil Medical College
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA 1 and ASA 2 Patients requiring endotracheal intubation for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Age between 18 and 60 years. Both male and female patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient refusal or inability to consent Patients undergoing rapid sequence intubation. Patients having restricted cervical extension and movements, tumours of oropharyngeal region, trauma to airway, previous surgeries in neck, local infection of neck, burns and swellings in neck region, previous difficult intubation. Pregnant patients. Obese patients BMI >30kg/m2 Patients with any of the following conditions were predicted to have difficult airway thyromental distance mouth opening cervical ankyloses class IV Mallampati score

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
to calculate and compare time to intubate. visualization of the laryngeal view by Cormack-Lehane grade. Successful first attempt.Timepoint: to calculate time to intubate at start of procedure/baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
number of intubation failure. number of attempts. change of anaesthesist and use of adjunct equipment. complications like oropharyngeal trauma,neck pain,dysphagia,hoarseness.Timepoint: complications in the recovery room and within 24 hours.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactLakshmi S Pillai

Shri B M Patil Medical College

sridevi.mulimani@bldedu.ac.in9449534216

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026