FindTrial
Sign In

Cannulation of Distal Radial Artery by palpation and ultrasound guidance and comparing which is a better method.

Comparison of perioperative ultrasound guided versus palpatory method of cannulation of distal radial artery: A Randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/04/033245
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-04-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I257- Atherosclerosis of coronary arterybypass graft(s) and coronary artery of transplanted heart with angina pectoris Health Condition 2: Q211- Atrial septal defect Health Condition 3: I083- Combined rheumatic disorders of mitral, aortic and tricuspid valves Health Condition 4: Q232- Congenital mitral stenosis Health Condition 5: K87- Disorders of gallbladder, biliarytract and pancreas in diseases classified elsewhere Health Condition 6: Q225- Ebsteins anomaly Health Conditi

Interventions

Intervention1: Distal radial artery cannulation by palpatory method: The operator will palpate the distal radial arterial pulse with their nondominant hand at the point where the axis passing through
GE Health Care co, Tokyo, Japan) to obtain an image of the distal radial artery at the estimated point of needle puncture. Under strict asepsis, an anesthesiologist will image radial artery using line

Sponsors

AIIMS Rishikesh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age between 18 â?? 65 years 2. American Society of Anesthesiology physical Status (ASA PS) I-III 3. Patients undergoing elective major surgeries requiring arterial cannulation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Absent or feeble arterial pulsation. 2. Refusal to participate. 3. Severe hypotension requiring inotropes. 4. Hemorrhagic shock 5. Skin erosions near the insertion site.(infection) 6. morbid obesity 7. History of peripheral vascular disease 8. Patients with negative Modified Allenâ??s test 9. Emergency surgeries 10. American society of Anaesthesiology physical status (ASA-PS) IV 11. Age below 18 years and above 65 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of first attempt success rateTimepoint: 5 minutes—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To compare degree of bias in MAP measurement obtained from distal radial artery and femoral artery. 2. To compare the total number of attempts for successful cannulation. 3. To compare the cannulation time. 4. To compare the complication with multiple attempts 5. To compare the ease of cannulation and ergonomics for the anaesthesiologist using the VAS (visual analog scale). Timepoint: 24 hours—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ajay Kumar

All India Institute Of Medical Sciences , Rishikesh

ajaymishra0701@gmail.com9340482058

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026