Skip to content

differences in satisfaction and grips between in making of two different dentures

Retention and patient satisfaction between conventional over simplified removable non balanced complete dentures - A randomized clinical trial.â??

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/04/033186
Enrollment
22
Registered
2021-04-28
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K081- Complete loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: conventional complete dentures: participants receive dentures fabricated according to conventional clinical and laboratory procedures. A preliminary impression is made with irreversible

Sponsors

Shanmugapriya
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Class I edentulous arches (ACP classification) 2. Residual bone height of 21 mm or greater measured at the least vertical height of the mandible on a panoramic radiograph. 3. Residual ridge morphology resists horizontal and vertical movement of the denture base; Type A maxilla. 4. Location of muscle attachments that are conductive to denture base stability and retention; Type A or B mandible. 5. Class I maxillomandibular relationship. 6. Class I palatal throat form proposed by M.M.House 7. Class I shape of posterior palatal seal area by Winland and Young 8. Wrights Class I of tongue position 9. The frenal attachment which is located away from the crest of the ridge is selected

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Class II, III, IV (ACP classification) 2. Residual alveolar ridge less than 20mm 3. Single edentulous arch 4. Residual ridge offering no resistance to vertical and horizontal movements 5. Class II and III maxillomandibular relationship 6. Class II, III palatal throat form proposed by M.M.House 7. Class II, III shape of posterior palatal seal area by Winland and Young 8. Wrights class II, III tongue position 9. Frenal attachment at the crest of the ridge 10. General disease 11. Allergic to materials in study 12. Previous denture wearers 13. Uncooperative patients 14. Mentally unhealthy subjects 15. Acute infections 16. Autoimmune diseases 17. Undergoing radiation therapy or patients consuming xerostomia inducing drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
retention and patient satisfactionTimepoint: 0,3 and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient satisfactionTimepoint: 0,3,6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGopi Naveen Chander

SRM Dental College

drgopichander@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026