Skip to content

Comparison of regional and intravenous analgesic technique

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided bilateral erector spinae plane block versus conventional intravenous patient controlled analgesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with midline sternotomy: An open label Randomized Control trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/04/033153
Enrollment
110
Registered
2021-04-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I251- Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Bilateral erector spinae plane block: Single shot ESP block performed at T5 level on both side with 0.3 ml/kg 0.5% ropivacaine. Control Intervention1: Patient controlled opioid analgesi

Sponsors

AIIMS Jodhpur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Belonging to ASA II/III, posted for elective cardiac surgery with midline sternotomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Not willing to participate in the study Emergency surgery Patient in whom fast tracking could not be possible patient with cognitive deficit Contraindications for fascial plane block LVEF Patient with liver and renal dysfunction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare post operative fentanyl consumption during first 24 hours of ICU stayTimepoint: first 24 hours of ICU stay

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score at rest and on cough during first 24 hours. To compare the Time to extubation in both the groups. To compare the peak inspiratory flow rate during first 24 hours. To compare the post-operative pulmonary complications like atelectasis,acute bronchitis,ARDS, Respiratory failure,aspiration pnuemonia etc in both techniques. To compare patient satisfaction score. To compare the Adverse effects of both the techniques. Timepoint: First 24 hours of ICU stay

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactManish Mohan

AIIMS Jodhpur

geetamanoj007@yahoo.co.in

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026