FindTrial
Sign In

comparison between conventional osteotomy and osseodensification technique

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF HARD AND SOFT TISSUE CHANGES AROUND DENTAL IMPLANTS PLACED WITH OSSEODENSIFICATION IN CONTRAST WITH CONVENTIONAL OSTEOTOMY TECHNIQUE: AN IN VIVO STUDY

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/04/033123
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-04-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: conventional osteotomy: a crestal incision will be given and full thickness flap will be raised under local anesthesia and implant will be placed with conventional osteotomy technique C

Sponsors

Institute of Dental Studies and Technologies
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Partially edentulous sites both maxillary and mandibular arches Ability and willingness of the patients to follow the study protocol Adequate bone width and height at the site of implant placement No signs of TMJ disorders

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: General contraindications to implant surgery Uncontrolled diabetes Bruxism Temporomandibular disorder Heavy smokers Chronic bone disease Psychiatric disorders Unrealistic expectations of the patient Inability to adhere to planned follow up Incapacity to give informed consent Participation in other clinical trial interfering with present protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
A crestal incision will be given and flap will be raised in the desired region under local anesthesia Implants will be placed using conventional osteotomy and osseodensification technique Early loading will be done for all implants with temporary prosthesis and will be restored with definitive prosthesis Standardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indicesTimepoint: Standardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indices—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Early loading will be done for all implants with temporary prosthesis and will be restored with definitive prosthesis Standardized follow up time will be 2 3 4 and 6 months after placement of implant to assess the hard and soft tissue behavior using various tests and indicesTimepoint: 2 months 4 months 6 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRajiv Kumar Gupta

Institute of Dental studies and technologies

dent.rajiv@gmail.com07795656715

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026