Skip to content

A prospective trial to compare the efficacy of â??Between the fingers Gripâ?? with conventional â??Pen holding Gripâ?? to hold an endotracheal tube for orotracheal intubation during procedure of General Anaesthesia

A prospective randomized control study to compare the efficacy of â??Between the fingers Gripâ?? with conventional â??Pen holding Gripâ?? to hold an endotracheal tube for orotracheal intubation - BETI trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/04/033106
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-04-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: I251- Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery Health Condition 2: I083- Combined rheumatic disorders of mitral, aortic and tricuspid valves Health Condition 3: I52- Other heart disorders in diseasesclassified elsewhere

Interventions

Intervention1: Between the finger grip : Between the finger grip to hold the endotracheal tube Control Intervention1: Conventional Pen holding grip: Endotracheal tube will be held just like a pen hold

Sponsors

SGPGIMS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients willing to participate 2. Cormack Lehane grade 1 / 2a / 2b / 3a 3. Intubation by experienced Anaesthesiologist

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. CL grade 3b/4 2. Patients with anticipated difficult airway 3. Patients with pasthistory of difficult intubation 4. Patients who previously underwent tracheostomy 5. Patients having any head or neck pathology 6. Patients with restricted neck movement

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the success rates of the modified grip with the control group (standard grip) in terms of number of attempts (upto two) and then requirement of assistance or aids to perform endotracheal intubation.Timepoint: Assessment done only once.(Ist time point)after Anaesthetic induction during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1) To calculate the time required in each grip [From introduction of ETT into mouth to 1st EtCO2 graph reading] 2) To compare the hemodynamic parameters (HR and BP) in two groups [from laryngoscopy till 5 min after intubation] Timepoint: 1. Baseline 2. Laryngoscopy for CL grading 3. At the completion of intubation marked by appearance of ETCO2 trace

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSoumya Thakur

Department of Anaesthesiology SGPGIMS, Lucknow

ptewari@sgpgi.ac.in9794393344

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026