FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the retention of two commercially available pit and fissure sealants

COMPARISON OF CLINICAL EFFICACY OF GLASS IONOMER BASED SEALANT USING ART PROTOCOL AND RESIN BASED SEALANT ON PRIMARY MOLARS IN CHILDREN

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/04/032999
Enrollment
50
Registered
2021-04-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K02- Dental caries

Interventions

Intervention1: Equia Forte: applied as pit and fissure sealants will be evaluated till 1 year Control Intervention1: Clinpro: Applied as pit and fissure sealant will be evaluated till 1 year

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Otherwise healthy cooperative children with fully erupted primary molars. 2. Deep pits and fissures present in these primary molars. [ICDAS II (International Caries Assessment and Detection System II)4 code 00] 3. Initial occlusal carious lesions involving the pits and fissures of enamel. [ICDAS II code 01] 4. Incipient carious lesion involving enamel. [ICDAS II code 02 and 03]

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Uncooperative child 2. Children whose parent does not give consent for the study. 3. Children with systemic disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
retention of sealantTimepoint: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
dental caries according to ICDAS II criteriaTimepoint: 1 month, 6 months, 12 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBHARGAVI RATNA VOJJALA

The Oxford Dental College

drkkiran@gmail.com9731196369

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026