FindTrial
Sign In

A study to assess microleakage with temporary cement fillings in patients undergoing Root Canal Treatment.

Evaluation and comparison of coronal microleakage of three different temporary restorations in patients undergoing Multiple Visit Endodontic Treatment - A Randomised Control Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/04/032806
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-04-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K041- Necrosis of pulp

Interventions

Intervention1: Glass Ionomer Cement FX II Improved: A new type of Glass Ionomer Cement claiming to have better temporary restorative properties which will To be used as a temporary filling material fo

Sponsors

Dr Siddhant Hiwale
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Patients of age group 17-60 years. 2) Patients scheduled for endodontic treatment and willing to participate in the study. 3) Incisors, canines and premolars with class 1 endodontic access cavity.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients with diabetes, chronic infective disease or any other immuno-compromised disease. 2) Teeth with mesio-occlusal, disto-occlusal or mesio-occluso-distal access cavities. 3) Teeth exhibiting fracture, insufficient crown height and questionable marginal integrity. 4) Teeth with developmental disturbances and X-rays showing multiple or deformed roots.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. To evaluate coronal microleakage in Cavit, Glass Ionomer Cement-FX-II-Improved and Orafil Light Cure restorations. 2. To compare the coronal microleakage in Cavit, Glass Ionomer Cement-FX-II-Improved and Orafil Light Cure restorations.Timepoint: Patients will be evaluated after a gap of 1 week after completion of root canal treatment—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To calculate the microleakage through Cavit, Glass Ionomer Cement-FX-II-Improved and Orafil Light Cure restorations by counting the number of colonies on Colony Forming Units (CFUs). 2. To compare microleakage through Cavit, Glass Ionomer Cement-FX-II-Improved and Orafil Light Cure restorations by comparing the count of the number of colonies on Colony Forming Units (CFUs).Timepoint: Patients will be evaluated after a gap of 1 week after completion of root canal treatment—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Siddhant Hiwale

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, VSPM Dental College and Research Centre Nagpur

prshenoi@gmail.com9822220506

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026