Health Condition 1: 8- Other Procedures
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: channelled blade versus non-channelled blade of King Vision Videolaryngoscope: To compare channelled blade of King Vision Videolaryngoscope with non-channelled blade of King Vision Vide
Sponsors
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Age 18-80 years American Society of Anesthesiologist 1,2,3 Emergency surgery under general anesthesia
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Mouth opening less than 3 finger breath in lying down position Neck contracture or irradiation Pathology of the upper respiratory tract Difficult airway requiring awake fibreoptic intubation Patients received intubated in emergency operation theatre Patients with BMI >30kg/m2 Patients who will not be extubated post operatively Patients refusing to give consent Patients who are hemodynamically unstable
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To estimate the time required for successful orotracheal intubation with channelled and non-channelled blade of King Vision VideolaryngoscopeTimepoint: Time for tracheal intubation will be defined as the time taken from introduction of blade (channelled or non-channelled) between the incisors until the endotracheal tube passes the vocal cord , the cuff is inflated upto the appearance of square wave capnography trace on the monitor | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the channelled and non-channelled blade of King Vision Videolaryngoscope for ease and success of intubationTimepoint: The ease of intubation will be graded by fremantle score. Time to obtain optimal laryngeal view will be defined as time from insertion of videolaryngoscopic blade to the optimal laryngeal view will be recorded. | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDr Sukanya Mitra
Government Medical College and Hospital 32, Chandigarh
Outcome results
None listed