Comparison of continuous pericapsular nerve group block(peng) versus continuous suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for post operative pain relief after hip surgery

A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF POST-OPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF IN PATIENTS RECEIVING CONTINUOUS PERICAPSULAR NERVE GROUP (PENG) BLOCK AND CONTINUOUS SUPRAINGUINAL FASCIA ILIACA BLOCK (SFIB) USING 0.2% ROPIVACAINE IN HIP SURGERY A RANDOMISED PROSPECTIVE STUDY - PENSFIB

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/03/032161

Enrollment

Registered

2021-03-19

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S720- Fracture of head and neck of femur Health Condition 2: S720- Fracture of head and neck of femur

Interventions

Intervention1: Continuous pericapsular nerve group(PENG) block: Ultrasound guided pericapsular nerve group(PENG) block pefrormed using 0.2% 35ml ropivacaine followed by infusion @4ml/hr Control Interv

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients aged 18 -85 years old , with American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status grades [ASA] 1-3 2. Scheduled for elective unilateral hip surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Known allergy or intolerance to any of the drugs used in the study 2. Hepatic or renal insufficiency 3. Opioid dependency 4. Coagulopathy 5. Pre-existing neurologic or anatomic deficits in the lower extremities Ã¢â?¬Â¢Severe psychiatric illness Ã¢â?¬Â¢Receiving general anaesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the 36 hour post operative analgesic consumption between Continuous ultrasound guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block, and the standard Continuous Suprainguinal Fascia iliaca block[SFIB] after hip surgeries.Timepoint: 36 hours post operative period	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Comparison of Static pain assessed by nVRS pain score at 3,6, 12,24 and 36 hours. 2. Comparison of Dynamic pain assessed by pain score at 12, 24 and 36 hours. 3. Comparison of quadriceps motor weakness in the two groups at 24 hrs and 36 hrs 4. Comparison of Patient satisfaction after the first 36 hrs.Timepoint: At 3,6,12,24,36 hrs for static pain score and at 12,24,36 hrs for dynamic pain score. Quadriceps motor weakness at 24 hrs and 36 hrs.	—

Measure

Time frame

1. Comparison of Static pain assessed by nVRS pain score at 3,6, 12,24 and 36 hours. 2. Comparison of Dynamic pain assessed by pain score at 12, 24 and 36 hours. 3. Comparison of quadriceps motor weakness in the two groups at 24 hrs and 36 hrs 4. Comparison of Patient satisfaction after the first 36 hrs.Timepoint: At 3,6,12,24,36 hrs for static pain score and at 12,24,36 hrs for dynamic pain score. Quadriceps motor weakness at 24 hrs and 36 hrs.

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSushil krishnan

Northern railway central hospital

dr.sushilkrishnan@gmail.com9717630552

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026