FindTrial
Sign In

To study if there is any benefit of scleral buckling in addition to pars plana vitrectomy in treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Comparative study of anatomical and functional outcomes following pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle for repair of primary non complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/03/032068
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-03-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 2: H330- Retinal detachment with retinal break

Interventions

Intervention1: Pars plana vitrectomy with 24% sulphur hexafluoride combined with scleral buckle: TWENTY FIVE GAUGE PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY COMBINED WITH ENCIRCLING SCLERAL BUCKLE AND 24% SULPHUR HEXAF

Sponsors

PGIMER
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with primary non complex RD i.e. total or sub total RD of less than 1 month duration (on history) with PVR less than grade B and willing to provide written consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with PVR more than grade B 2. Patients with traumatic RD 3. Aphakic patients 4. Myopia greater than 2 D 5. Patients of coloboma RD 6. Patients having early requirement of air travel 7. Patients having RD with choroidals 8. Any media opacity precluding the view of fundus like dense cataract 9. One-eyed patients 10. Patients with orthopaedic disability 11. Patients with abnormal mental status 12. Patients with giant retinal tear 13. Retinitis related RD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of single-surgery complete anatomic success between patients undergoing 25G PPV with SF6 tamponade versus patients undergoing 25G PPV and 240 SB with SF6 tamponade for primary non-complex RRD (Complete anatomic success is defined as attachment of the macula and the peripheral 360 degree retina up to the ora serrata)Timepoint: 24 hours, 1 week, 2 week, 4 week, 3 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Comparison of change in BCVA between the two groups 2. Comparison of the change in refractive error 3. Comparison of duration of surgery between the two groups 4. Comparison of the number of secondary surgical/laser procedures needed during 3 months of follow-up (repeat PPV, cataract surgery, PCO removal, glaucoma surgery) between the two groups 5. Comparison of the degree of retinal displacement (on ultra-widefield fundus photography and short-wave autofluorescence imaging)Timepoint: 3 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rajesh Dhull

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)

mohit_dogra_29@hotmail.com9814108019

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026