Skip to content

Comparison between Mucograft and connective tissue graft in gingival recession cases.

Comparative evaluation of collagen matrix and connective tissue graft along with coronally advanced flap in the treatment of gingival recession defects: A randomized control clinical study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/03/031917
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-03-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K060- Gingival recession

Interventions

Intervention1: Muco gingival surgery: connective tissue graft with coronally advanced flap Control Intervention1: Muco gingival surgery: collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap

Sponsors

Dulari Parekh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Miller s Class I or II gingival recessions at least >= 2 mm located on incisors canines or premolars Age >=18 years Presence of tooth vitality No periodontal surgical treatment in the previous 24 months on the involved sites Sufficient palatal donor tissue for the indicated CTG Patients with cervical decay fillings or non carious cervical lesions are included after removal of any filling material or decay from the root surface and reconstruction of the lost tooth structure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with systemic diseases or conditions coagulation defects psychiatric disorders pregnancy Patients with a history of smoking or current smokers and tobacco chewers Inability or unwillingness to complete the study Patients on steroid therapy Patients with a history of drug allergy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the clinical efficacy of collagen matrix to that of connective tissue graft in combination with CAF in the treatment of Miller s class I and II gingival recession defectsTimepoint: baseline 1 month 3 months 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare root coverage gain after using collagen matrix to that of connective tissue graft in combination with CAF in the treatment of Miller s class I and II gingival recession defectsTimepoint: baseline 1 month 3 months 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Shivlal Vishnoi

Manubhai Patel Dental College

vishnoishivlal@gmail.com9586869196

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026