Study Aims at Comparison of two treatment modalities(LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY AND MINI IMPLANT FACILITATED MICRO-OSTEOPERFORATIONS) for faster orthodontic movement of teeth which will decrease treatment time.

â??COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY AND MINI IMPLANT FACILITATED MICRO-OSTEOPERFORATIONS ON THE RATE OF TOOTH MOVEMENT - A PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDYâ??

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/03/031874

Enrollment

Registered

2021-03-10

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Micro osteoperforation: Three perforations at a gap of 3 mm at the extraction space with Mini implants. Intervention2: Low Level Laser Therapy: Application of 810 nm wavelength low lev

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients with Angleâ??s Class II Div1 malocclusion (indicated for bilateral maxillary first premolar extraction) or Bimaxillary protrusion (indicated for all first premolar extraction). 2.All subjects with age group of 18 â?? 30 years. 3.All subjects undergoing treatment with Pre-adjusted Edgewise Appliance (PEA) with 0.022 MBT prescriptions. 4.Subjects who have completed the leveling and alignment (1st Phase).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Previous history of orthodontic treatment. 2.Presence of craniofacial anomalies. 3.Presence of any signs and symptoms of gingival and periodontal diseases. 4.Long-term use of phenytoin sodium, cyclosporin, anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroids, and calcium channel blockers. 5.Poor oral hygiene for more than 2 visits. 6.Severe skeletal Class II malocclusion, overjet more than 10 mm. 7.Systemic diseases. 8.Evidence of bone loss. 9.Past periodontal disease. 10.Smoking. 11.Gingivitis and caries

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The primary outcome to compare the tooth movement with low level laser therapy and modified micro osteoperforation in two different groups.Timepoint: Subjects will be evaluated at baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks later on his or her opd visits.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
secondary outcome is to acess discomfort level in the patients during the treatment with Micro- osteoperforation using a numerical rating scale and to check analgesic effect of Low level laser therapy during orthodontic tooth movement.Timepoint: Subjects will be evaluated at baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks later on his or her opd visits.	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Mukesh kumar

Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre

manishortho@yahoo.com7009201137

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026