Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: Graded CuNiTi arch wires: Alignment efficiency of graded CuNiTi arch wires during initial orthodontic treatment
Control Intervention1: Conventional CuNiTi arch wires: Alignment efficien
Sponsors
NASLA P
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Angles Class I or Class II malocclusion, Age group 12 to 18 years, Littles irregularity index of minimum 7 mm, Patients with absence of periodontal diseases, No history of medical problems or medications that could influence pain perception
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Malocclusion correction required treatment procedures other than continuous arch wire mechanics, Patients who had undergone previous active orthodontic treatment, Patients with relevant medical history, Participants taking pain medications for chronic pain, Participants with a positive history of dental pain or pain in the orofacial region
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To compare the efficiency of alignment of crowding in the maxillary anterior segment between graded CuNiTi with conventional CuNiTi arch wiresTimepoint: After 4 months | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Compare the associated painTimepoint: After 4 months;Compare the differences in maxillary incisor inclinationTimepoint: After 4 months;Compare the differences in maxillary inter canine widthTimepoint: After 4 months | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactShobha Sundareswaran
Government Dental College, Kozhikode
Outcome results
None listed