Trunk Stabilization Versus Interferential Therapy in Improving Urinary Incontinence in Female Recreational Athletes

Pelvic Floor Exercises With Trunk Stabilization Versus Pelvic Floor Exercises With Interferential Therapy In Rehabilitation Of Stress Urinary Incontinence In Recreational Female Athletes- A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/03/031672

Enrollment

Registered

2021-03-02

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Interferential Therapy: Patient position: The treatment will be given in supine position with knees placed apart. Position of electrodes: Four electrodes of standard size (50mm x 20mm),

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age group : 18-30 years 2. Gender : Female 3. BMI:18-24 kg/ m2 4. Nulliparous female athletes 5. Recreational female athletes those who exercise 45-90 minutes, 2-3 times per week 6. Recreational athletes who complaint of SUI 7. Who can understand English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pelvic fractures patients those who undergone previous gynaecological or neurological operations for correction of stress incontinence. 2. Tumors 3. Urge incontinence 4. Psychological impairment 5. Any gynaecological infection menstruation 6. Diabetes mellitus 7. Not willing to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pad testTimepoint: Pad test Will be taken at Baseline and 6th Week (Post Intervention)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)Timepoint: Will be taken at Baseline and 6th Week (Post Intervention)	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNidhi Rajeshkumar Panchal

C M Patel College of Physiotherapy

drparthtrivedi@live.in9979017118

Outcome results