EFFECT OF ACTIVE VERSUS PASSIVE MOBILIZATION WITH MOVEMENT(MWM) ON PAIN,RANGE OF MOTION AND FUNCTIONAL ABILITY IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS

effect of Active Versus Passive movement with mobilization(MWM) on Pain, Range of Motion and functional ability in knee osteoarthritis- A Randomized Controlled Trail.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/02/031595

Enrollment

Registered

2021-02-26

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M170- Bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee

Interventions

Intervention1: Active MWM: osteoarthritis patients will be randomly divided into two groups Group A-Subjects undergoing MWM active Movement.It includes lateral glide , medial glide or rotational MWM A

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Both male and female 2. Subjects aged between 40 to 60 years 3. Subjects with knee osteoarthritis Grade I II and III by Kellegren Lawrence.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Metal implants in lower limb any infection or neoplastic disorder post traumatic knee stiffness Peripheral vascular disease. Secondary OA knee Any surgical procedures done for lower extremity in past 6 months Neurologic disease Any initiation of opioid analgesia or corticosteroid or analgesic injection for knee pain Uncontrolled hypertension

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Visual Analogue Scale Range of motion ( goniometer) Timepoint: 2 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Functional Outcome Scale(WOMAC)Timepoint: 2 weeks;Pain, range of motion and functional abilityTimepoint: 2 weeks	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBhagyashri R Pawar

KLE institute of physiotherapy

anandhegs@gmail.com9945282896

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026