FindTrial
Sign In

A study comparing treatment effects on hyoid bone and cervical posture by two different appliances which bring the lower jaw forward.

Evaluating Treatment Effects Of Herbst And Advansync On Hyoid Bone And Cervical Posture In Skeletal Class II Malocclusion

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/02/031571
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-02-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Herbst Appliance: Herbst appliance will be given to the patients for a duration of 6 to 8 months for correction of skeletal class II malocclusion. Control Intervention1: Advansync Appli

Sponsors

DR ARCHANA JAGLAN
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Skeletal Class II malocclusion. 2) Retrognathic mandible. 3) Positive virtual treatment objective (VTO). 4) Minimum crowding in dental arches.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Evidence of systemic disease. 2) Poor oral hygiene. 3) Missing first permanent molar. 4) Severe crowding in dental arches.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Upon removal of Herbst and advansync appliance changes in hyoid bone and cervical posture will be evaluated.Timepoint: After 7 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Upon removal of Herbst and advansync appliance other changes produced will be assessed.Timepoint: 7 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Seema Grover

Sgt Dental College

seema.grover@sgtuniversity.org9810636828

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026