Skip to content

comparision of two recent methods of ridge split namely peizo and motorised device

Comparatitive evaluation of alveolar ridge split and expansion using ultrasonic surgery ( peizo) device and motorized ridge expansion- a randomized control trial.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/02/031564
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-02-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K063- Horizontal alveolar bone loss

Interventions

Intervention1: motorise ridge split device,: motorised ridge spliit kit is a newly available device for ridge split as an preprosthetic surgery. Control Intervention1: Ultra sonic ( peizo) bone cuttin

Sponsors

Government Dental college and hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. cases indicated for implant prosthesis with ridge width of 3-6mm, height 10mm and more 2. individual fit for minor surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. ridge width less than 3mm and more than 6mm 2. unfit for minor surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ridge width gainTimepoint: intra operatively (at baseline)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
survival rateTimepoint: six months after impalnt insertion

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Varsha Sunil Manekar

Govt Dental College & Hospital, Nagpur

varsha_manekar@yahoo.co.in9823077626

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026