FindTrial
Sign In

comparison of controlled ventilation with traditional mask ventilation in a nonbreathing newborn - A manikin based study

Efficacy of controlled ventilation with a non invasive ventilator versus traditional manual ventilation for providing positive pressure ventilation while resuscitating a newborn in delivery roomâ??â??â??â??â??â?? - The NeoVent Project

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/02/031553
Enrollment
30
Registered
2021-02-25
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Non invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), provided using ventilator device Drager Babylog VN500.: PPV provided using either a 250 ml silicone SIB manufactured by Anaesthetics

Sponsors

Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Neonatal advanced life support certified health care professionals 2. Resident doctors or Pediatric or Neonatology consultants - working in NICU or managing newborns in delivery room for 1 year prior to enrollment in study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refusal to consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the difference in time (in seconds) to achieve chest rise during PPV among the devicesTimepoint: 3 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Need for performing ventilation corrective steps. 2. To compare the difference in PIP and breath rates delivered during positive pressure ventilation among the devices 3. To evaluate cognitive or task load for each device optionTimepoint: 3 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactShilpa Kalane

Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, Pune

drshilpakalane@gmail.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026