FindTrial
Sign In

comparison of two different plating systems for fracture of the lower jaw

Comparison between three dimensional and standard miniplates in the management of mandibular fractures- a prospective, randomized, case controlled study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/02/031495
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-02-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structures

Interventions

Intervention1: Three Dimensional Miniplates in the management of Mandibular Fractures.: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing Open reduction & Internal Fixation for

Sponsors

SGT Dental college
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients irrespective of gender. Patients above 16 years of age. All partially and complete dentulous patients with non comminuted mandibular fractures of Symphysis, Parasymphysis, Body and Angle. Patients with fairly good general health condition according to American society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA- I and II) fit to undergo fracture treatment under GA/LA.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Medically compromised patients (ASA 3 AND ASA 4) will not be included. Patients with communited fractures and fractures in sagittal plane. Edentulous patients. Patients with known history of allergy to titanium. 5. Any other associated fractures of the facial skeleton involving occlusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the outcomes in patients undergoing Open reduction & Internal Fixation for Mandibular fractures with conventional miniplates and 3 Dimensional miniplates. Timepoint: clinical evaluation at immediate post op, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months radiographic evaluation at immediated postop and at 1 month—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To clinically Measure the bite force generated preoperatively and postoperatively. To clinically evaluate post-operative mouth opening. To clinically evaluate protrusive and laterotrussive movements. To clinically assess the stability of the post-operative intercuspation based on the need for post-operative IMF/IME. To radiographically assess post-operative hardware failure. To radiographically check the degree of reduction achieved (distraction at lower border).Timepoint: Clinical evaluation at immediate post op 7 days 1 month 3 months Radiographic evaluation at immediated postop and at 1 month—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAasimah Hameed

SGT University

jitender.kumar@sgtuniversity.org9050254652

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026