FindTrial
Sign In

STUDY COMPARING PAEDIATRIC VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE WITH DIRECT MILLER LARYNGOSCOPE FOR ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CONVENTIONAL MILLER LARYNGOSCOPE AND PAEDIATRIC C-MAC VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE FOR ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION IN PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS POSTED FOR ELECTIVE SURGERY UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/02/031441
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-02-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY WITH MILLER BLADE: TIME TAKEN FOR INTUBATION WITH DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY WITH MILLER BLADE Intervention2: VIDEO LARYNGSCOPY WITH CMAC: TIME TAKEN FOR INTUBATION WITH CM

Sponsors

JSS MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA 1 & 2 2. WEIGHT: 10-20 KGS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. PARENTAL REFUSAL 2. OROPHARYNGEAL ANOMALIES 3. SIGNS OF UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
GLOTTIC VIEW BY MODIFIED CORMACK-LEHANE GRADINGTimepoint: During Laryngoscope and intubation.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
ATTEMPTS FOR INTUBATION DURATION REQUIRED FOR SUCCESSFUL INTUBATIONTimepoint: AT TIME OF INTUBATION—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNANDI VINAYAKA B

JSS MEDICAL COLLEGE

BPMANJULA5@GMAIL.COM9845501226

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026