Skip to content

comparison of effects from zirconia and titanium abutments in anterior region

â??A CLINICAL STUDY TO EVALUATE AND COMPARE THE BIOLOGIC AND ESTHETIC OUTCOME OF ZIRCONIA AND TITANIUM IMPLANT ABUTMENTS PLACED IN ANTERIOR ESTHETIC ZONEâ??â??-AN IN VIVO STUDY

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/02/031227
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-02-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: zirconia abutment: implant rehabilitated with zirconia abutment and layered zirconia crown 6 months Intervention2: titanium abutment: implant rehabilitated with titanium abutment and la

Sponsors

Self
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Males and females aged at least 18 years-40 years. 2. Successfully osseointegrated single tooth implant (ADIN®) inserted at least 16 weeks after tooth extraction. 3. Full mouth plaque index

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Systemic diseases that would interfere with dental implant therapy (e.g. diabetes). 2. Any contraindications for oral surgical procedures 3. History of local irradiation therapy 4. Patients who smoke >5 cigarettes per day or tobacco equivalents or chew tobacco 5. Subjects who had undergone administration of any investigational device within 30 days of enrolment in the study 6. Conditions or circumstances in the opinion of investigator that would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results such as history of non-compliance 7. Physical or mental handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene 8. Pregnant or breastfeeding women 9. Alcohol abuse 10. Existing implants in adjacent position 11. Patients with inadequate oral hygiene or unmotivated for adequate home care 12. Probing pocket depth of >=4mm on one of the teeth immediately adjacent to the dental implant site 13. Lack of primary stability of the implant 14. Inappropriate implant position for the prosthetic requirements 15. Major simultaneous augmentation procedures 16. Insufficient stability of implant 17. Height of the abutment is 18. Severe bruxing or clenching habits

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The aim of this study is to assess and compare the esthetic and functional outcome of single tooth anterior implant restorations as affected by the abutment materials (i.e., Zirconia versus Titanium abutment) restored with layered zirconia crowns using an esthetic composite index combined with patient perception feedback.Timepoint: 8-9 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
â?¢ To establish a total Pink Esthetic score and White Esthetic Score of single tooth implant restorations with Pre-Fabricated Titanium Abutments and zirconia with Layered Zirconia Crowns. (Group A& B) â?¢ To assess patient satisfaction by means of a questionnaire in both the groups. â?¢ To compare the total PESWES scores of both the groups. Timepoint: 8-9 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDiksha

SGT UNIVERSITY

reshu.sanan@sgtuniversity.org8800581146

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026