None listed
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention1: Chewing Efficiency: comparing between conventional complete denture and Mandibular mini dental implant supported overdenture
Control Intervention1: Patient satisfaction: with Convention
Sponsors
Faculty of Dental Sciences M S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Completely edentulous upper and lower arches , Adequate bone width and height to place an implant of at least 2.4mm diameter and 10mm in length
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Patients with poor neuromuscular function, All patients who are contraindicated for undergoing surface EMG.( cardiac pacemakers , epilepsy), Undergone radiotherapy, Immune compromised ( on immune-steroid therapy), Need for any soft tissue or hard tissue augmentation, Bruxism, Any health conditions contraindicating implant placement (osteoporosis etc.)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| chewing efficiencyTimepoint: 4 weeks after insertion of conventional complete denture and then that of mini implant overdenture | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| patient satisfactionTimepoint: 4 weeks after insertion of prosthesis | — |
Countries
India
Contacts
Public ContactDr Ravishankar K
Faculty of Dental Sciences, M S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences
Outcome results
None listed