FindTrial
Sign In

to verify and compare Crestal bone levels and implant stability for dental implants when they are placed and immediately loaded in grafted and non-grafted bone- split mouth study

â??A Comparative Evaluation of Implant Stability and Crestal bone levels in Immediately Loaded Implants Placed in grafted versus non-grafted bone.â??- An in-vivo study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/02/031135
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-02-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth Health Condition 2: K084- Partial loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: PLACEMENT OF IMPLANTS FOLLOWED BY IMMEDIATELY LOADING IN GRAFTED AND NON GRAFTED BONE: COMPARISION OF IMPLANT STABILITY AND CRESTAL BONE LEVELS IN IMMEDIATELY LOADED IN NON GRAFTED SIT

Sponsors

SAKSHI RAWAL
Lead Sponsor
DR NUPUR DABAS
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients having grossly decayed or grade III mobile mandibular posterior teeth indicated for extraction and willing for tooth replacement, without any acute exudate/pus. 2. Patients having minimum available alveolar bone height of 3-4 mm present apically from the base of the extraction socket at the restorative site. 3. Patients having minimum available inter occlusal space of 8-10 mm at the restorative site.â?¨ 4. Patients with good oral hygiene.â?¨ 5. Patients who do not have any known systemic disease.â?¨

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 .According to ASA Classification Class 4 patientsâ?¨ Organic heart disease with marked signs of cardiac insufficiency.â?¨ Recent myocardial infarction of less than 6 months duration.â?¨ Unstable angina.â?¨ Patients with advanced degrees of pulmonary, renal or endocrine insufficiency.â?¨ 2 .According to ASA Classification Class 3 patients Uncontrolled diabetes with complications to vascular or other organs, i.e., retinopathy, neu- ropathy, etc.â?¨ 3. Immunocompromised patients. 4. Blood dyscrasias 5. Occlusal anomalies Deep Bite Cross Bite 6. Para-functional Habits • 7. Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarettes per day).â?¨ 8. Alcohol abusers.â?¨ 9. Recent history of any acute illness .â?¨ • • • • • • • Bruxism 6. Radiation therapy in orofacial regionâ?¨ 6 10. Patients having unrealistic expectations and psychological problems. 11. Local Factors : Insufficient inter-arch space Edentulous opposing arch (maxillary arch)â?¨ Intraoral draining sinus in relation to the proposed implant siteâ?¨ Perforation and/or loss of labial bony plate during extractionâ?¨ Radiographically assessed jumping space greater than 2mm circumferentiallyâ?¨ Unfavourable implant axis orientation Patients with TMJ disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
IMPLANTS STABILITY AND CRESTAL BONE LEVELS SIMILAR FOR BOTH GRAFTED AND NON-GRAFTED SITESTimepoint: BASELINE, 1 MONTH, 3 MONTH, 6 MONTHS—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
IMPLANT STABILITY AND CRESTAL BONE LEVELS IN IMMEDIATELY LOADED IMPLANTS ARE SIGNIFICANT FOR EACH GROUP AND NON-SIGNIGICANT WHEN COMPARED IN GRAFTED AND NON-GRAFTED SITE.Timepoint: BASELINE, 1 MONTH, 3 MONTH, 6 MONTHS—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSAKSHI RAWAL YADAV

SGT UNIVERSITY, GURUGRAM

drnupurdabas82@gmail.com9873163023

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026