Skip to content

COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS OF PAIN RELIEVING PROCEDURES FOR PAIN RELIEF IN POST OPERATIVE PERIOD IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR THIGH BONE FRACTURE

COMPARISON OF PATIENT CONTROLLED ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK WITH PATIENT CONTROLLED EPIDURAL BLOCK FOR POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR FRACTURE FEMUR

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/02/030966
Enrollment
80
Registered
2021-02-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane block for post operative analgesia: 1. ULTRASOUND GUIDED ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK The patient will be placed in sitting position. Under all ase

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesia and Care
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of either gender with American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Grade I and II, aged 18-65 years, undergoing unilateral femur fracture surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Contraindication to blocks (coagulopathies/ on anticoagulants/ local site infection). 2.History of allergy to local anaesthetics. 3.Patients with cardiac, renal , hepatic, neurological or respiratory diseases. 4.Patients with Body mass index (BMI) >=30 kg/m2 5.Patients who demonstrate inability to operate patient controlled analgesia pump and those unable to understand the NRS score.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the efficacy of post-operative analgesia provided by patient-controlled erector spinae plane block with patient controlled epidural block using cumulative Numerical rating scale (NRS) score at 24 hrs.Timepoint: 0 2 4 6 8 12 and 24 hrs

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To compare the total number of boluses of local anaesthetic by patient controlled analgesia pump consumed over 24 hours in both the groups. 2. To compare the amount of rescue analgesia required over 24 hrs in each group. 3. To compare the patient satisfaction in terms of quality of pain relief using the Likert scale. Timepoint: 0 2 4 6 8 12 and 24

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr K A Manu

Vardhman Mahavir Medical college and Safdarjung hospital

drsainisumannony@gmail.com9891228793

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026