Skip to content

Comparing two different Vibration frequencies on the rate of orthodontic Tooth Movement

Comparative evaluation of the effect of two different Vibration frequencies on the rate of orthodontic Tooth Movement ââ?¬â?? A cross over randomized controlled trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/01/030823
Enrollment
28
Registered
2021-01-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K006- Disturbances in tooth eruption

Interventions

Intervention1: 60 Hz Dental Vibrating Device: A 60 Hz Dental Vibrating Device will be given to each of the patients and will be used by them for 10 mins every day for 2 months Control Intervention1:

Sponsors

Dr Sakshi Sachdeva
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Subjects must be 18 - 45 years of age 2. Subjects that require bilateral 1st premolar extraction. 3. Subjects must have complete adult dentition (excluding third molars) 4. Subjects must have class I malocclusion or mild class II/III malocclusions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subjects who are taking medication that could affect the level of inflammation, such as chronic antibiotics, phenytoin, cyclosporine, ant-inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroids, or calcium channel blockers. 2. Subjects missing adult teeth (except the 3rd molars) or with severe class II or class III malocclusion. 3. Subjects with skeletal class I but extreme dental malocclusion 4. Severe crowding that require extraction 5. Subjects having systemic diseases effecting bone metabolism 6. Subjects who are non-compliant regarding the recommended daily usage of the device

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the efficacy of 2 different frequency vibrations in accelerating tooth movement. To measure the total amount of retraction in each of the frequencies by measuring distance from distal of the canine to the third rugae.Timepoint: T0- Before the start of retraction T1- After 2 months of using 1 frequency 1 Month washout period T2- After 2 months of using second frequency

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To collect the GCF samples and compare the RANKL/OPG ratio for different frequencies in the patientsTimepoint: T0- Before the start of retraction T1- After 2 months of using 1 frequency 1 Month washout period T2- After 2 months of using second frequency

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Sakshi Sachdeva

Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore Affiliated to Manipal Academy of Higher Education

siddarth.shetty@manipal.edu9980044933

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026