Comparison of silk suture and cyanoacrylate adhesive after mandibular third molar surgical removal

Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Or Silk Suture For Closure Of Wound Following Surgical Removal Of An Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Randomised Comparetive Study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/01/030720

Enrollment

Registered

2021-01-22

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Marvilyte tissue adhesive: It is a sterile non toxic biocompatible haemostatic and bacteriostatic agent.It is monemer,when it comes in contact with moisture it gets coverted in to polym

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients who are having mesioangular or horizontally impacted mandibular third molar (ClassII Position B, PELL & GREGORY classification). 2. Patient in the age group of 18-35 years 3. Not allergic to the drugs or anesthetic agent used in the surgical protocol. 4. ASA Grade1 Normal healthy patients.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnant or lactating patients. 2. Patients with signs of pericoronitis or active infection. 3. Patients with deleterious habits such as smoking, alcoholic. 4. Patients with poor oral hygiene

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
HaemostatisTimepoint: first ,third and seventh post operative days	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Post operative pain and wound healingTimepoint: first ,third and seventh post operative days	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactNusrin Thoniyotupurayil

Yenepoya Dental College

arvind_raoht@rediffmail.com9448142508

Outcome results