FindTrial
Sign In

Comparative study between different reporting systems for thyroid cytology.

Comparative analysis between Conventional and the Bethesda system of reporting thyroid cytology 2017 in evaluation of different lesions - A cross sectional study.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2021/01/030707
Enrollment
91
Registered
2021-01-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: E00-E07- Disorders of thyroid gland

Interventions

Intervention1: Conventional Method: The reporting of the prepared smears will be done according to the Conventional Method as unsatisfactory, benign, follicular lesions, intermediate and malignant. Co

Sponsors

Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of all age groups with thyroid lesion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patient with infection at the site of aspiration. 2.Bleeding disorders.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparative analysis between Conventional and the Bethesda System of reporting thyroid cytology 2017.Timepoint: Not Applicable.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Prevalence of cytology pattern of thyroid lesions.Timepoint: Not Applicable—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRachit Batra

Rohilkhand Medical College & Hospital, Bareilly.

anjanaarya.singh15@gmail.com9412125824

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026