For patients undergoing operation we use two instruments.Both are attached with camera and we put the tube into the mouth by seeing the video and compare the advantage and disadvantage among both the instruments.

Randomized controlled trial comparing Mcgrath Mac video laryngoscope with King vision video laryngoscope in adult patients undergoing surgery

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2021/01/030673

Enrollment

Registered

2021-01-21

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: KING VISION video laryngoscope: To access the ease of intubation and haemodynamic changes during intubation Control Intervention1: MC GRATH video laryngoscope: To access the ease of int

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Mallampati score 1 to 3 2. Patients under ASA 1 and 2 3. Elective surgeries

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Extremes of age(less than 18 and more than 70) 2. Patients on beta blockers 3. Emergency surgeries

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To access the ease and effecetives of intubation among MC GRATH and KING VISION video laryngoscopeTimepoint: within one minute	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To access the duration and haemodynamic changes during intubationTimepoint: Hemodynamic changes after 1 minute of intubation	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactG Prabu

Sks Hospital and Postgradute Medical Institution

gprabu_mmc@yahoo.co.in9884469456

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026